South African Sourdough Starter - Day 1

Profile picture for user TorontoFlour

Hi. I am a bit frustrated here. I bought 3 sourdough starters from sourdo.com, Ischia, Camaldoli and South African.  I tried the Ischia for 7 days and then the Camaldoli for 7 days but neither would start. So 2 weeks later and after a lot of wasted flour I am trying the South African Sourdough starter which is for whole wheat. I have been doing everything exactly by the book (reading the instructions a 100 times and checking and double checking).

I started the South African Sourdough this morning at 90F for 24 hours. After about 5 hours it had about 1/4" of hooch on the top. Now 12 hours later it has about 1/4" of hooch about 1/2" up from the bottom, none at the top any more, but it does not smell really foul - just kind of like beer I guess. None of the other starters that didn't start ever had hooch on the bottom. The instructions say that if it has hooch on the bottom AND it smells bad that the starter has been contaminated and must be 'washed', but I guess one only does this after the first 24 hours. But my question is if it seems to smell ok (I think!) but the hooch is on the bottom it does not satisfy both tests, so is it contaminated or not?

I guess the other problem is maybe I don't know how bad it is supposed to smell to be contaminated and I have no reference to go by really.

Any advice? I've been emailing Ed Wood who I bought these starters from but he just keeps asking the same questions over and over (ie if I have followed the instructions) and now won't respond for 4 days.

No, the other starters were thrown out as I didn't think there was a reason to keep them. I have the whole wheat starter split into two and can put them into my proofing box at 75F

until this starter get established.  Once it's going gangbusters and the yeast are well developed, the 70° won't be so bothersome.   Don't feed yet.   :)

They are in the proofing box with the digital thermostat set to 23.9C (75F). No one ever suggested raising the temperature before or to actually stop feeding.

to catch up.  Takes a while and the culture can change in the process if a long lag time is needed.  I think I've mentioned it before and on other threads, but never mind.  Funny thing here on TFL... often the same subject pops up in several threads at the same time or one thread leads to another closely related thought.  Never hurts to read other threads going on at the same time.   

24°C is still rather conservative but the starter will be able to adjust to cooler temps sooner after the yeast has been well. established.  So... do you know what to look for when the starter is ready to feed?  

I'm typing in:  When to feed a starter...  see what pops up...

Also what are the signs of fermentation?

Edit:  I see Mariana has come back, I humbly bow to her advice and am very interested in the next few steps.   

Hi Mini!

Your advice was right on spot, i.e it was time to rise the temperature :) Thanks! It is easy to miss in the instructions that the 21C phase lasts only 24 hours. The wording in the instruction booklet says 'in the next 24 hrs reduce the temperature to about 70-75F and feed every 12 hrs'. And after that 29C is perfect, where both yeast and lactic bacteria grow in tandem. 

The following charts indicate the dynamic, showing that in the interval 28-29C wild yeast grows the fastest, doubling its numbers every 60 min. Whereas lactic bacteria doubles its numbers fastest at 32C, every 45 min, so @28-29 it will slow down a bit and double its numbers about every hour as well, step in step with yeasts. : )  Charts taken from Dr. Daniel Wing's book The Bread Builders, 1999

We are dealing here with specific cultures from Dr. Wood and his instructions are quite good. No need to deviate from them.

Yours, on the other hand, are very good instructions for the starter, created from scratch (flour and water, spontaneously fermenting mix): i.e. stop and don't feed until several generations of microbes pass and the dominant ones will establish themselves. I often do that as well, when I create a starter from scratch using Nancy Silverton's recipe for san-francisco type starter. 

 

Thank you, MiniOven!

mariana

 

and I too have dried starters and have played around with restarting them.  Interesting that a cool ferment is followed by a very warm one.  

Is the starter then lowered to a maintenance temperature?  

Does the warming of the starter need to be repeated with future starter feeds?  

Is there specific ways to build this specific starter in preparation for bread dough use?  

Can I apply this technique to an existing random sourdough starter?

until later as well.   I don't want to pull too much attention away from the current operation .  I am drawing some interesting parallels with body heat and pocket warmed starters. 

Thank you again.

Hi!

Glad to hear from you and to hear good news, that the 'beery' odor started shifting towards 'more fragrant'. Mine smells realy nice, 'lovely' indeed. And gives fantastic taste in bread. 

Now, it's time to shift temperature to 29C.

In other words, the hot stage (30-32C) lasts 24 hrs, or until you get the acid load appropriate enough for the yeast to kick in. Then the cold stage lasts 24 hrs or so, until it starts bubbling, as in your last pictures. After that, switch to the 29C and keep your starters there, feeding with bread flour (NOT freshly milled, white or WWF - your choice)

Feed 1 part starter to 1.5 parts fresh dough (i.e. 200g starter+120g -140g flour+180g water) every 12 hrs or so, and they will begin to foam within 2-3 feedings and eventually they will show 2 and 3 inch rise in 2 hrs. 

South African starter 2 hrs after feeding (@27-29C) - 3 inch rise

If you are not too far from me (Bloor West and Keel) and you are willing, you can bring me your starters, we can check their true pH and TTA (and I'd show you how to track it). Or send me 1tsp sample of each in regular envelope. Take 1 tsp of starter, mix with 1 Tbsp white flour into crumbly mass and place in a small pouch - nylon or paper. OK? I can give you my address via PM. 

best wishes

mariana

 

Ok I did exactly what you said and they are the proofing box at 29C now. I noticed when taking them out of the box at 24C that they had 1/2"+ of liquid at the top which they did not have before I put them in. I remixed the starter before leaving all but 200g each in the jars and then adding 140g Arva Mill hard white flour and 180g Ice Age water. I added 140g instead of 120g as I've noticed the Arva flour seems to have more moisture than store bought floor. It was milled about 5 weeks ago.

I can't tomorrow but maybe if you are around on Wed I will take a drive out and take you up on your offer. I am at St. Clair & Mt Pleasant. I will PM you. Thanks so much!

OK. Wednesday is fine for me, except between 3:30-5:30PM when I'd be away, meeting with my p.t.(rainer). Anytime between 9AM-9PM is cool. 

Remember that aeration stimulates yeast growth, so give it a good whip now and then (you can do it every 2 hours if you wish). I use handheld mixer, I remove one whisk and plunge the oner inside the jar. 1 min on high speed. Dr. Wood calls it " "stir the mixture with sufficient vigor to beat in additional air".

 

Like so

 

I also have Arva flour, and I like it. : ) You did absolutely right when added 140g of white. It is always the case: 140 white or 120 whole wheat. But the same 180 g water.

 

 

5 weeks is enough for the flour to age and become good for baking. Average is 4-8 weeks, depending of the frequency of aeration of the flour ( to expose it to oxygen of the air, to mature it).  

And I have a couple of extra packets of interesting starters from Sourdo International that I can give you (Finish and French), if you want to give white flour based starters another chance. Once you learn how to track acidity (both pH and TTA), the starter activation is a no brainer, really. 

 

best wishes, 

mariana

Ok I whipped it good, lol.

An offer of free sourdough starter? OMG you are too kind!

Oh and I can't wait until this is a no-brainer for me because right now my brain is fried.

I've used the Arva for my pizza dough and commercial yeast bread and noticed that it seems to only need about 85% of the water I normally use. Otherwise it is just way to wet. The owner of Arva was supposed to get back to me on why that was but I haven't heard back from him yet. I ended up buying 30kg of their Daisy hard white and 10kg of their pastry flour for a total of $99 shipping included and sold one on Chowhound for what I paid.

After almost 12 hours in the proofing box this is what it looks like this morning. Both jars look about the same. It hasn't risen above the line but is slightly below.

There is the tiniest bit of foam on top which disperses as soon as the jar is picked up and tilted a bit and almost 1/2" liquid. The smell is in between beery and fragrant. I guess I feed it and whip it now.

Very good, Thanks for the pictures!

Now, pour off the excess of liquid... since your white flour has such low absorption capacity, add less water when feeding. Wash jars with baking soda in between feedings, please. 

Can't wait to meet your starters in person! I have no idea what kind of smell is 'beery'. I have never had that in starters. : ) 

mariana

This is at 1:30pm today about 12 hours after last feeding. The liquid is now about 1/4" high but is forming now underneath the surface which also happened in the previous feeding. I noticed the level rose beyond the marks about and inch yesterday evening but then went back down by the time of the feeding, then rose again after the next feeding but then went back down to the original level. I am washing the bottles, putting 120g of starter back in, adding 140g white flour and now about 160g of spring water vs 180g, then mixing it with a spoon then using a handheld mixer to aerate it, then back in the proofing box as before.

marking on the jar or starter separation?  It almost looks like starter separation.

Edit:  If it is separation then, Congratulations!  

(waiting for Mariana, but I would say you got it eating thru the flour already and from the glass, looks like you got a lot of lift off of this runny starter as well!  Funny place to separate.  You will be baking soon!)

These are lovely looking starters, TF. Well done!

So, you are basically over the hump now in terms of culture activation.

Just feed them with more hard wheat flour and less water from now on. Your flour's gluten is completely digested by proteolytic enzymes and that is why the mass is rising and then goes flat and releases the water in form of a layer of hooch under floating foam. It has no gluten by the time you feed it.

It doesn't affect bacteria and yeast in any way, i.e. it is flour-water interaction, but visually it is a flat mass with foam on top. As if the microbes were dormant. They are not! I get the same if I let my starter sit long enough before feeding it again. 

See ya, today after 6PM. Anytime after 6PM I'll be home armed with chemicals and lab instruments to give your babies a good check up : ) 

 

Please bring your home milled RedFife, and your Arva Unbleached. We'll compare them to mine in terms of quantity and quality of gluten and water absorption capacity. OK? 100-200g sample of each flour would be enough. 

Until then, 

mariana

match the data in the other 2 .....or are my eyes too old to see them clearly.  The other two seem to be based on Ganxle's work.   Ganzel's data shows that LAB out produce yeast at all temperatures from 36-93 F and the closest that yeast get to the LAB rate is at room temperatures 62 - 82 F with 72 - 75 being the closest LAB to yeast ratios for reproduction.  Here is Ganzle's raw data and Happy Baking

 

Reproduction Rates of LAB and YeastL/Y 
T(°F)T (°C)L. SF IL. SF IIYeastRatio
     36         2 0.0190.0160.0053.787
     46         8 0.0470.0430.0212.222
     61       16 0.1440.1500.1141.265
     64       18 0.1870.1980.1631.145
     68       20 0.2390.2590.2251.064
     72       22 0.3010.3320.2951.021
     75       24 0.3740.4160.3651.024
     79       26 0.4530.5080.4141.094
     82       28 0.5350.5980.4171.284
     86       30 0.6090.6720.3461.760
     90       32 0.6580.7060.2023.255
     93       34 0.6570.6710.050

13.127

Hi dabrownman,

 

how are you today? :)

The first chart shows the rate in fractions of maximum rate which is specific for each strain and species. I.e. If specific strain of certain species of yeast reproduces at 20C at 50% of its maximum speed (0.5 is 50% fraction of 1 on the chart), and lactobacillum next to it is reproducing at 40% of its maximum speed, we would say that yeast reproduces faster than lactobacillum, i.e. that it responds more positively at that temperature, doesn't mind to reproduce quite fast at that temperature , compared to the lactic bacteria. 

The numbers that you show in the table, simply tell us that the number of cells of lactic bacteria in sourdough is a limiting factor. I.e. sourdough Torula holmii yeast will never reproduce at larger numbers per hour than bacteria Lb.sanfrancisco (unless there is a lot of free sugar in the dough, which happens when  we feed 1:2, 1:4, 1:20 etc...), because it is lactic bacteria who split starch into sugar and yeast steals a bit of that sugar for themselves.

That is why it takes 100 bacterial cells to leave enough leftover sugar on the table, to feed 1 yeast cell in sourdough without sugar supply. And it would take 200 bacteria to feed 2 yeast cells, 300 bacteria to feed 3 yeast cells, etc. 

that is what this ratio L/Y near 1,0 tells us in the range of 16-28C/60-82F, at which sourdoughs use to ferment in bakeries. At these temperatures we see balance of numbers yeast:lactic bacteria equal to 1:100 maintained, more or less. 

best wishes, 

mariana

most SD starters and levains that are maintained and cultured at room temperature, with enough of the right food, the ratio of LAB to yeast will stabilize somewhere around 100 to 1.  Those temperatures and feeding schedules  also produce the least sour starters and levains which lead to mildly sour SFSD style bread which is fine since that is what most people like the best - by far and away.  Any yeast in a mediums without sugar supply will struggle whether it is in a SD culture or not.

The amount of food that LAB supply to yeast and the other way around when yeast break fructose bonds for LAB is quite negligible in the scheme of things.  Commercial yeast do quite well, reproduce quickly to raise bread dough when there are not any LAB around all and fructose only makes up 1-2% of sugar flour.  So, like most things, this symbiotic relationship is a relative one in the real world.

Love this thread and Happy Baking 

Thanks for pointing all that out, but I didn't find they were that different because:

1) The book was merely providing an explanation for why one proofs for 24 hours. It was not specifying that you must test the pH after 24 hours to make sure it has a pH of 4.5 and if it doesn't to extend the time, ie explaining that you proof for 24 hours because by that time the acidity will be promoted. If testing was required then any reasonable person would have expected that he would have specified that, especially if it was that critical that there be a specific level of pH. I expected that if I did what he said then what he explained about why I was doing it would happen, ie the acidity level.

2) Yes they are different but not totally inconsistent as 12-24 hrs means either 12, 24 or in between. Leaving it for 12 hours is consistent with the printout at 12 hours. Also my printout says feed enough water to maintain 'pancake-batter consistency' the same term the book uses. It's just that the book doesn't also say 3/4 cup water. However both direct you to achieve the same end result by using exactly the same amount of flour - 1 cup. As such, the exact amount of water does not appear to be important. The final result is of 'pancake-batter consistency' is.

3) Again both the book and printout specify to achieve the 'pancake-batter consistency' so they are not inconsistent. Again, they both specify 1 cup of flour. Here the book and printout were not consistent.

Then, A strict reading of the book directs one to do the first feeding at 70F, then continue feeding every 12-24 hours, and then because the next sentence says 'it will be necessary to discard about half the mixture before each feeding' then one must do so only after the second feeding at 70F. I took it to just be a general statement to do it before each feeding, but not the first one because the culture hadn't really expanded by that point. Anyway, very ambiguous at best! As you point out the printout is much clearer, ie divide into two jars after he first 12 hour proof (at 70F).

4) Again, not inconsistent. You are feed both 1 cup of flour to get the pancake-batter consistency.

As for Readiness, the book says 'about' 3 inches, the printout says 'about 2 inches'. If you interpret about 3 inches to include 2.5 inches and about 2 inches to be 2.5 inches (that doesn't sound that unreasonable does it?) then they are not inconsistent.


With all due respect. I think we are splitting hairs here. Given we are dealing with a live organism and flour here and both instructions both allow 12 hours (one 12-24 hours, one 12 hours) between feedings, both require discarding about 1/2 the culture after the feedings (one after the first proof, one arguably only after the second), both specify to achieve a pancake-batter consistency and both require the end result of a rapid rise of about 2 or about 3 inches within the same time period, ie 2-3 hours of the last feeding to me they close enough so as to be the same instructions.

Ed Wood certainly didn't seem to think I was doing anything wrong when I wrote copious emails to him about exactly what I was doing, except to suggest that doing the initial proof for 24 hours at 90F in an oven on the proof cycle at 90F was somehow (inexplicably to me) different from proofing in a proofing box at 90F, both monitored by a thermostat and confirmed by a separate thermometer.

I have, btw, sent him a number of emails asking him to please respond to my questions and he simply ignores me after initially engaging me and asking me the same questions over and over and saying he would get back to me once he got my answers which I sent him more than once. I can't believe the guy is still in business the way he treats customers.

 

TorontoFlour,

I'm sorry I didn't ask the right question. I know you followed the instructions. You had already stated that. When I asked about what you are doing, I really mean that I need to know what you're doing. I don't know what his instructions are, so "following his instructions" doesn't help me to help you. From what I gather, the instructions said to proof at 90F for 24 hours. That already sounds insane, whatever the rest of it is. If his culture is good, you should be able to mix a little with some warm water and flour and see activity in a few hours at the most. It also seems that you're putting too much water in it. I really think his instructions may be leading you astray. The liquid you see on the bottom is not hooch. It's probably water. Separation happens sometimes when the starter is too wet. If you will list the procedure you followed, someone could probably tell right away what the problem is, because the procedure is probably the problem.

 

Thanks. The 24 hour proof at 90F and other instructions is from Ed Wood's book, Classic Sourdoughs, and apparently is typical to activate the sourdough starters he sells. You realize this is the dried starter out of the foil package that I am trying to activate.  I can't imagine the book he has been selling for a long time is totally wrong. The instructions say that after the initial 24 hour period at 90F that you feed it every 12-24 hours for 3-5 days to see activity (every 12 with the South African one which is intended for whole wheat flour, which I am using).

As for what I see on the bottom being water, that explains something for me, thanks.

If this is made with whole wheat flour, then the larger particles tend to separate and you get the layered effect. It should smell beer-y or yeast-y. If it was contaminated with undesirable bacteria, it starts to smell like old rancid cheese, toe-jam or sweaty athletic socks. I used a variety of descriptions but I think you get the idea. Overall-yuck.

I confess I just scanned the prior thread. I remember when I started with sourdough how confused and intimidated I was because I didn't understand what was happening.

First of all-relax. I t sounds like you have a good start. There have been yeasts that have been recovered from Egyptian tombs that have been used to brew beer today. It sounds like your yeasts are waking up. Yeasts are amazing creatures and you will get to experience them in your bread!

The easiest way to get a culture going is-flour, water, time. The yeasts you want to make bread are already on the grain/flour (if it is Unbleached and not heated). Nature provides. Everything on this planet is covered microscopically with what can digest it for food (including us!). The by-product of their digestion of the carbs and sugars is carbon dioxide (bread traps as bubbles) and alcohols (which give all fermented products their characteristic flavor). 

By using a dried culture, you can jump start the process a little but you still have to allow the culture to come into balance. A sourdough culture consists of the lactobacillus (which make a favorable, acidic environment) and the yeasts (the workhorses for our breadmaking purpose). When you wet the dried culture, the yeast "wakes up" and immediately needs food and reasonable warmth. Actually, its warmth requirements are the same as a humans but with a narrower "favorite" range of about 80-92F. Lactos like it a little cooler, I believe. So when you revive the culture, some lactos are present,some yeast are present and at first the lactos growth will quickly surpass the yeast.Lactos can raise the level and produce gas but generally it is too weak to completely raise bread-esp with multiple risings.  As you feed and maintain the culture, the yeasts (esp if you keep it in their favorite temp range) will gradually dominate. Eventually, they will come to a balance and survive.

Generally, the more liquidy the culture is kept at, the faster it needs to be fed-esp if it is warm. If it is kept cooler, the yeasts and lactos generally get sleepy and don't eat as much. It will be very noticeable if you have seasonable temp changes in the kitchen. I like to keep my culture like a thick pancake batter consistency when I start it-it is just easier to stir and see the rise.I think it is easier for a beginner to see what is happening when it is a little thicker and the level actually rises in the jar rather than the bubbles just escaping from the surface.. If it is too liquid, the bubbles rise and break the surface so its hard to judge if it actually rises.  Others swear by a putty like consistency. You will get all kinds of advice to do all different things. Try one thing consistently for a while and make note of successes and failures. Repeat or not on subsequent attempts.

So stop following directions to a T and look at your culture. Figure out what is happening in their world. It is like having a microscopic pet-does it need to eat? Have the cage cleaned? Is it sleepy? Does it need warmth? Later, you will also benefit from looking at your dough/bread and not looking at a clock. It will be ready when its ready-it doesn't matter if the timer has dinged.

Have fun! Start by making pancakes and enjoying the deliciousness. No special recipe-Starter,flour,milk,egg,baking soda,salt, sugar-mix and griddle-enjoy!

 

Thanks for taking the time to give me that detailed explanation, but I do have to say that someone telling me not to following the instructions to a T does leave me a bit bewildered given I've had 2 cultures in a row not activate after 7 days each and Ed Wood even provides a special booklet of instructions just for the South African sourdough starter. If I had done this before and had some terms of reference I would be less likely to following everything to a T. Also, Ed wood kept asking, before he went totally silent, whether I had been following his instructions closely and to tell him exactly what I am doing.

But, this starter has now twice risen 3 inches in the first 3 hours after the 12-hour apart feedings so it appears to be activated. This last time, just now, I gave it less water than usually so the consistency was a bit thicker than before. I want to see if the water forms again at the bottom.

It does smell very beer-y, more like a Guiness I would say, and a bit rank, but it's not a total turn-off to smell it.

that it is actively fermenting.  It starts out mild but increases (as it should) with time. When this beery starter is first fed 1 to 2 (starter weight to flour weight, plus water) the smell is of wet flour.  As soon as the population of yeast increase enough to give off gas, it will start to smell like beer again. The more the flour and water mixture ferment and thus breaks down and no longer contains the gas, the smell of beer gets stronger.  Strong smells come off mature sourdoughs.  Judging the smell of a starter requires experience and a good sense of smell.  I have a neighbour who has lost her sense of smell.  Very interesting,  another day.

When I first sense the beer smell in a new starter, I leave it alone (no food) to mature another day before removing a portion to feed.  I tend to mix up my starters in a clean bowl (like the asian rise bowl shape) and then put them into a jar or container to ferment.  I don't like the fermented  edges of the older container interfering with my nose and combining with the aromas coming off the newly fed starter.  The "cage" is kept clean to observe the starter dropped cleanly into the middle.  Wet fingers level the surface if firm.

I'm guessing here but if you had mentioned the beer smell to Paul Wood.  This would explain his lack of interest, help is no longer needed.  The starter is active.

When the culture is active and established, separation is rare.  The active mixture tends to stir itself if thin and a thick one doesn't separate except if it gets really really over-ripe, then it oozes.  

Thanks. It has separated itself into a layer of about 5/8" of water or hooch or whatever you call it at the top now. I am getting litmus paper to test the acidity (which is in very short supply in Toronto it seems!).

As for Ed Wood, since you mentioned him (Ed, not Paul), he just kept asking me the same questions and said he would answer when he got the answers which he asked more than once (and I gave more than once) and then he went silent even though I have asked him to please get back to me now that I have given the answer. The last he heard there was a layer of liquid on the bottom, which is not mentioned anywhere in the book or his instructions. I don't see he has any excuse for not giving customer service or telling me that the starter was active, it is indeed is. Takes 2 seconds to reply.

many years ago about separation at the bottom of a starter, trying hard to remember what the cause was.  I will see if I can find the thread.  

http://www.thefreshloaf.com/node/3025/starter-w-liquid-bottom

There are several, most give reference that circle around to Debra Wink's solution to the problem.  Read carefully.

http://www.thefreshloaf.com/node/10901/pineapple-juice-solution-part-2

Other threads on the "Hooch on the bottom" theme mention that this tends to happen when the whole grain flour is suddenly replaced with white wheat flour.  This makes a lot of sense as the gluten in the wheat flour increases forming a sort of dough ball that is trapping and loaded with gases from the first forming bacteria and therefore, floats. 

The plain flour addition, and or coupled with particular early bacteria seems to also delay the process resulting in a viable culture.  Corrections are made by returning to an increase in whole flour (more variety of bacteria and yeast) and reducing the feeds (to starter amounts) so acidity can continue to drop.   Every time fresh food is added to the starter it raises pH.  I strongly suggest that should your starter float, reduce or stop feeding so that pH can fall (acid levels rise) and the culprit bacteria can be phased out by more acid loving bacteria.  Continue feeding (use extreme conservation) after seeing the floating flour sink or it stops separating at the bottom of the starter after stirring.  

"So 2 weeks later and after a lot of wasted flour..."    Doesn't need to be, most starters use way too much flour.  I've gotten good starters with as little as half a cup total flour over a week.  Yes.  More flour is less when it comes to activating or creating starters.  Once the yeast appear, then the starter goes through flour.   

...a layer of liquid on the bottom, which is not mentioned anywhere in the book or his instructions.

 

hi, it's me again. Dr. Wood specifies the meaning of the layer in the middle on on the bottom in the booklet for the South Africa culture. Here's a photocopy of that instruction

 

...and the portion where he explains that it might indicate contamination, unless the culture 'has a pleasant odor and continues to respond when fed" (p29 in his book)

The sentence you are referring to was the reason for my very first post and that is why I wrote it.

In my first post I describe that I had a layer of hooch on the bottom, which I am now informed in this thread was not liquid but hooch (which is it?). Also that I didn't know if there was an 'unpleasant odor' or not. So, I did not know if I was fulfilling the two tests of odor + hooch on bottom or not.

Also, even if so, the instructions only say contamination 'may' have occurred. Without any way of knowing if it did then washing should be done I guess. But I don't even know if the test was fulfilled. I seemed not to have hooch on the bottom, but liquid, and also really have no reference to go by to know if the odor is unpleasant or not.

added info for anyone else pulling up the thread that perhaps has a floating starter.  Also the links I gave have more to do with Whole wheat starters (very common) but applications can be made.  You can look back at the starter and understand more of what was going on at the time, when it was difficult.  

Now that there is liquid on the top, I have been looking for ways you could test your starter for pH without a meter or special paper.  Been looking for some kind of chart dealing with baking soda amounts and common kitchen acids with which you could compare.  Cider vinegar has 4.5 to 5 pH for 5% acid (sounds interesting)  If you were to take say a teaspoon of water and combine with baking soda and measure the reaction, then take cider vinegar and do the same, and then take a spoon of hooch and test with baking soda.  How close could you come to knowing if the pH was lower than 4.5?  Combine beer with baking soda?    (need to be rather accurate with a scale) or...

2.0 - Lemon Juice
2.2 - Vinegar
3.0 - Apples
4.0 - Wine and Beer

See where I'm going here?

Hurrah! : ) 

You will get a starter going. I am sure. Keep up the good work!

What do you think about adjusting your hydration a bit ( make a thicker batter), so that it doesn't separate?

Also, using RobinHood Best for Bread whole wheat flour would help immensely. It has high gluten content and its gluten is very robust and absorbs a lot of water. NEVER separates even at 200% hydration level. 

 

 

There are actually four conditions that together indicate that the local flour micro-flora is thriving in your batter

1) foaming

2) low acidity which can be determined by tasting the batter or numerically with pH meter. 

3) foul smell

4) foaming ceases as you continue to feed the batter with fresh portions of flour and water

In your case, the following feedings show that the starter did not continue to respond when fed. I.e. the bubbling has ceased along with new feedings. Therefore, there was some contamination.

However, it is all in the past now. Once pH of the current batter gets down to 4.0, the sourdough yeast will kick in. For them it's a signal that it is now safe to reproduce. 

Good morning, MiniOven

 

Finding this fascinating!

 

and I too have dried starters and have played around with restarting them.  

 

Dried starters are different from dry microbial cultures. Dried starters are usually restored in 24 hrs. Cultures, they usually take longer (to develop a sourdough starter based on that culture), minimum 2 days, normally 3 or even 5 if you don't track acidity and pH. Dr. Wood sells cultures for starters (microbes mixed with flour). They are not dried and pulverized starters per se. 

The difference would be the same if you sold someone  dried yeasted bread dough, in order for them to restore it into a fresh and bubbly yeasted dough and propagate it as a source of yeast for baking... Or if you'd sell dry yeast (pure yeast) mixed with a little flour in a packet : ) 

Is the starter then lowered to a maintenance temperature?  

South African culture doesn't have 'maintenance temperature' per se, because the culture, once activated, is stored (preserved, conserved) refrigerated and small portions of it are used to inoculate sponge (leaven, levain), which , in turn, will inoculate bread dough.

 

 

Does the warming of the starter need to be repeated with future starter feeds? 

Yes, but not to as high T, as when you activate dry culture. I.e. when one activates dry culture, one goes through

(1) high T stage of 32C

(2) cold stage of 21C (or even as low as 18C)

(3) normal warm stage of 29C

So when one takes a portion of a culture from refrigerator, one brings it first to 29C (warming up the culture). Next, blend about 400g of this sourdough with 600g of warm water (lower its acidity) and take 250 g of that, add 90g flour and enough water to obtain thick batter consistency. Thoroughly aerate the mix (whip it). 

Then it is left for 2-4 hrs @ room temperature (21-24C) and if it rises 2-3 inches in that time, it is considered activated (from the lethargic cold and over-acidified state). Next, it can be used to inoculate sponge (leaven, levain) for the future bread dough. 

Temperature at which the sourdough sponge and dough are fermented strictly depend on the recipe for a specific kind of bread, I guess. In Dr. Wood's book, he states his personal preference for the 2 stage sponge fermentation

(1) per 1 cup of active culture (200g of chef, starter) add  90g flour + 120g warm water. 

3hrs @18-21C, then 6-10 hrs @ 26-29C. 

(2) alternatively, one can do one stage sponge "hot" fermentation: 6-8 hrs @ 29-32C. 

From this sponge a portion is taken, fed, proofed for 1 hr,  and kept refrigerated as a stock culture for future baking. The remainder is used to inoculate bread dough which again ferments for 8-12 hrs @21-24C. 

 

Can I apply this technique to an existing random sourdough starter?

I don't know which technique you refer to, but each kind of starter requires its own process, in order to preserve its microbial association and character (its flavour, essense). I guess as an experiment, one can give it a try with an existing random starter : ) I don't know.

Dr.Wood's process is more typical of treatment of san-francisco type starter that has Lb.san-francisco in association with C. miller in it. Other starters have different yeasts and different LAB, they are treated differently, have their own protocols.  

 

best wishes, 

mariana

Yes, Mini 

they are in symbiotic relationship with LAB, so both are included, yes. : ) 

mariana

Toast

Hi Mariana,

First of all I can't thank you enough for letting me come over and spending all of that time with me giving me a college level course in starter and dough technology. I think most of it sunk it but I never would have believed there is so much going on behind the scenes the starter cultures. And thanks for letting me borrow some of your testing apparatus. You are too kind!

(Correct me if am wrong on any of this Mariana, it was a long evening), but what happened was, after Mariana gave me a detailed course on yeast, microbes, bacteria, gluten and water absorption of dough and how to test various levels we worked with my starters. It seems that the flour I was using, hard white flour milled about 5 weeks ago and red fife flour milled just before adding it seems to be the major problem. The amount of protein and quality of protein was not high enough to activate these starters successfully. That plus a few techniques Mariana showed me. The two cultures I brought were reduced to 200g of each by pouring some out. Then they were fed on a 2:1 basis, 120g flour + 180g spring water to 200g starter. But, one was fed a bread flour (Robin Hood Best for Bread flour) and the other Red Fife flour that had been aged already (vs mine which was freshly milled). We tested both beforehand and both had a higher protein content than what I was using.

Anyway, the flour was incorporated into the culture first, in a bowl, and then mixed on high using a hand mixer on low. Then the flour was added and it was mixed on high with the hand mixer for about 2 minutes until it started to become a dough and not cling to the sides, kind of like kneeding it. Then it was poured back into the jar. We tested that pH on each after that and it was 4.5- on each, but should be 4, and the TTA (which I learned how to test) was less than 4 but it should be 5-8 on one culture and 8-10 on the other I think (now I can't remember which!).

Mariana told me that the culture would likely rise in the jar within a couple hours. I was not too hopeful but about 2 hours later the flour fed white culture had risen 2" and the whole wheat 1". An hour after that it was 3" and 2", which please me immensely after my lack of success in the past getting it to rise. I tested the pH and TTA and both were the same as before.

This morning, both have gone back down to what they were when we started which I was told they would likely do. The pH on both seem to be just under 4.5 with maybe the whole wheat a bit closer to 4 (pic of it below). However, the TTA of the white flour is 4 and the TTA of the whole wheat is 6!

The last feeding was at around 10pm last night so I will feed it shortly again using the same procedure as before.

Here is a pic of the 2 cultures (white on right, whole wheat on left) last night just after midnight. They rose another inch each an hour after that (rubber band is where they started). Also below is a pic of the pH of the whole wheat about 9:30am this morning.

Thanks so much again Mariana for the incredible help you gave me last night! You are life-saver and a saint.

What a beatiful picture , T.Flour : ) Gorgeous starters indeed !!!

Congratulations, I am so so so so sooooo happy for you. And for your well fed and well cared for starters : ) 

to recap a few procedures from yesterday

1) to fortify any flour that is not standard quality: those that are sold as organic, pure, 100% flour nothing added, hard wheat, etc. 

1/8 tsp Ca-Mg-VitC supplement per 250 g flour

1/2 tsp diastatic malt  per 250 g flour

2) best water is Canadian Spring for dough, Distilled water for tests

3) strongest flour for starters is RobinHood, either Best For Bread or All Purpose, both unbleached and whole wheat. 

add 2-3% wheat germ from freezer to whole wheat flour  (but not to whole grain wheat flour)

4) Flours of specific brand and specific designation, i.e. No-Name all-purpose, or Five Roses unbleached all purpose, or RobinHood Best for Bread...etc. will be very stable in quality from bag to bag, year to year. So it is enough to determine their water absorption capacity and gluten content only once.

All other flours have to be tested for each bag, each purchase, they will vary wildly in their quality depending on the quality of wheat milled and left unadjusted. 

5) Water absorption capacity test. Take 25g of medium hard water and add enough flour to obtain medium soft dough. Determine how many grams of flour it took and calculate water absorption for 100g of flour

Arva unbleached flour has water absorption capacity about 60%

RobinHood best for bread flour (white) has water absorption capacity about 72%

6) Gluten content test

50 g flour + 30g water (not distilled, medium hard) + small pinch of salt, mix, divide into 2 equal parts.

let one ball rest for 20 min and another - 60 min. Wash out gluten and weigh it. Multiply x4 to get gluten content of 100g of flour with 20 min autolysis and with 60 min autolysis. 

Note the quality of gluten. How extensible it is, how elastic (tough to stretch), how sticky, etc. 

7) pH test

5 g substance (dough, bread crumbs,etc) + 45 g distilled water, blend well, dip pH paper into it and compare the color with the chart

pH of sourdough starters usually  stays in 4.0-4.5 range and depends on buffering capacity of flour. The more ash content (the more bran flour has) the higher is buffering capacity of flour. I.e. pH of the starter will reach certain level and stay there for a long time, even though the TTA will continue to rise. 

8) Acidity test (total titratable acidity)

5g of dough + 50g distilled water + 2-3 drops of indicator (phenolphthalein)

Blend well

add 1/2 N NaOH solution until liquid in the bowl turns pink and stays pink. 

See how many grams of NaOH it took to neutralize all acid in the bowl and multiply times 4. This is your TA (total acidity)

Proper TTA values for mature starters

stiff rye starter, whole grain 13-16

stiff rye starter, medium rye 12-14

 

liquid rye starter, whole grain 10-13

liquid rye starter, medium rye 9-12

 

stiff wheat starter, white flour 6-8

stiff wheat starter, whole grain flour (70% hydration) 11-12

 

liquid wheat starter, white flour 4.5-5.5

liquid wheat starter, medium ash content (50:50 white and whole grain mix) 6-7.5

liquid wheat starter, whole wheat > 7.0

 

9) feeding starter. Different starters are fed at different temperatures and in different proportions of flour:flour, different hydrations. The process of feeding a starter, however, is more or less the same and consists of tree steps:

- mix starter with water, 1min on high speed

- add flour, 1-3 min on low to medium speed or until fully homogeneous

- let rest for 10-20 min and mix, until well aerated shows signs of gluten development. 

best wishes, 

mariana

It is now soon 12 hours after I last fed the starters. Both levels have dropped a bit but the whole wheat, which had the better readings, is about 3/4" above the level it was when it was fed, which I would think makes senses given it had better readings, and the white one just slightly above the level. Neither dropped totally back to the original level like the previous feedings. I will do a test before feeding again so I know what to do next.

I've been looking at Ed Wood's book, Classic Sourdoughs, and it says to create a culture proof from the fully active culture. For the culture proof he says to split the active culture into two jars first, feed it and proof it 8-12 hours before moving on to the dough proof. First, I am wondering if I should deviate from his instructions to add 2/3 cup flour (90g) and enough water to maintain a pancake like consistency and proof for 8-12 hours. He says he likes to proof at 65-70F (18-21C) for 2-3 hours, then 6-10 hours at 80-85F (26-29C). I am wondering because it sounds like I am duplicating what I have done before to get the culture activated? Or is this indeed another step I need to do.

Also, under Dough Proof he doesn't say what to do with the other jar. Is this the jar you save for to use in the future?

 

TFlour, I think it would be better to first stick to the brochure for the African starter and complete starter process and bake test loaves using recipes from that brochure. Later on well discuss book instructions, OK? 

One starter and one process at a time. 

So. Should your cultures be ready tomorrow... I.e. by the end of the 8-12 hrs fermentation they reached proper TTA levels, you would feed them , let them sit for 2 hrs at room T and place them in refrigerator. 

Should you then want to start preparing a sponge with one of your starters for one of the bread recipes in the booklets, let me know. I will do as you do and we'll compare our notes, and bake breads OK?

mariana

Also, Mariana, I noticed you don't have a TTA for stiff wheat starter, whole wheat flour but you do for whole grain. I am curious because is that not what I have? ie was what we had last night not stiff rather than liquid? Maybe I don't know what you mean by liquid vs stiff starter I thought there was only one kind.

Whole wheat means whole grain : ) 

lt's just in Canada when they sell us 'whole wheat', it is not exactly whole. So you have to add wheat germ. Preferably roasted and milled finely with portion of four. 

I think Canada is the only country in the world where whole wheat is not the same as whole grain : ) Usually these are identical terms in meaning. In Canada whole wheat means 'white flour + added bran' and 'whole grain' means 'the entire grain milled into flour'. Just as you do at home. 

Freely flowing starters are liquid, they can be thick liquids or thin batters, but they flow.  Those that are in one piece that you can hold in you hand - stiff, firm starters. their hydration levels range widely, due to different water absorption of different flours. 

Depending on the recipe of certain breads, you will be required to adjust your starter to a different consistency (or different flour - rye, wheat, etc). Right now don't worry about that part. Right now you need to track only two numbers

liquid whole wheat starter and liquid bread flour starter TTAs. 

Thanks for that good guide. My starter didn't beat as dough-y this morning when I fed it as it did last night at your place and the only difference is I used Robin Hood All Purpose Whole Wheat flour for the second starter and last night we used Red Fife flour which was aged. I must have whipped each for at least 3-4 minutes but they were a bit more on the liquid side.

So it looks like neither my pH or TTA is where it should be yet as I have:

White flour starter - pH 4.5, TTA 4

Whole wheat flour starter - ph between 4 and 4.5, TTA 6

I take it I now just wait until 12 hours have passed at 21C and test again?

 

Yes, please. Test again in 12 hrs @ 21C and if TTA isn't there yet, keep the jar(s) at 32-34C, until TTA gets where it belongs.

My starter  took 12 hrs @21C PLUS 10 hrs @33C to get there for the first time. Now it reaches proper TTA range in 8-10 hrs after feeding, kept @21-24C. 

Adjust water to get consistency of thick pancake batter, please, i.e. as in my examples above, to about

200g starter

145g flour

160g cool water

180 g water seems too much. The KIND of flour is not the only difference. You use different water, with very low salinity (Ice Age vs Canadian Spring). That liquefies your batter even more (lack of salts in water relaxes dough). So, please, fortify a bit with Ca-Mg-Vit C powder, OK? 

Remember that Canadian whole wheat flour requires addition of 2-3% of wheat germ. Did you add wheat germ  when you fed your whole wheat starter? Lack of germ will affect dough rising speed, overall volume of dough, and rate of bacterial metabolism (TTA) and reproduction. 

Otherwise, it is ready to be used in baking, I think. : ) 

Your assessment of 85% of normal amount of water for Arva was right on spot, actually. Since we determined its water absorption to be at 60 % level and average Canadian white flour has water absorption at 72%. 60 is 83% of 72. Go figure : )  Well done!

Hurrah!!! : ))))

mariana