The Fresh Loaf

A Community of Amateur Bakers and Artisan Bread Enthusiasts.

Under-proof and over-proof

Stephen's picture
Stephen

Under-proof and over-proof

I’d like to stress that this is the same dough recipe and not two separate doughs that iv baked.

one is clearly over, and the other is under-proofed, but what’s interesting to note is that this is the same dough batch, both done exactly the same, with temperature checks throughout and with the same amount of folds/turns, you name it.... all done the same. But iv ended up with two loaves both in opposite ends of the spectrum.

the original loaf I baked, which was over-proofed (from a previous post, not this one) led me to bake another which I fermented at a cooler temperature 69f as apposed to 75f/80f as before. (Which I believed would fix my first mistake.)

After 2 1/2 /3hrs I cut the dough in half, pre-shaped, rested, shaped again, then put it in the fridge to bake in the morning, and otherwise done everything else the same as before as I had with the previous over-proofed loaf. Then a cold proof of between 2c/4c, again this is the same as the previous loaf... was this too cold to ferment?
There was no rise or movement at all when I pulled it out the following morning.
but it was in the fridge for about 18hrs. I’d finished shaping at about 4 in the afternoon the day before and baked at 10ish this morning.

When I baked the first one, I felt I’d understood what I’d done wrong, I knew the moment I took the lid off the tin.

the bulk ferment stage was done too cold this time, which left it under too underdone when I went to proof it in the  fridge overnight. 
so next time it needs to ferment higher than 69f but no higher then 75f/80f. Ok I’m getting closer now to getting it right. Maybe the next batch I do I’ll go some wry in the middle ?
You can imagine my frustration when thinking,I know what the next loaf will come out like then (from the same dough batch), and yet this one came out over-proofed,again, like the original ... am I missing something here? I have to wonder, if I’d done this as just one big loaf, I might of got a perfect balance between the two ? . 
as I say, every element was the same, except of course one was baked before the other; the under first, then the over.

But with a bake time of 45 odd minutes at 450f/230c and with the other loaf still in the fridge at 4c I find it very unlikely that it could over-proof in that time frame whilst I’m baking the first. The next loaf went In 10 mins after the first came out to reheat the pan.

Can anyone give me some clarity as to what I have done wrong this time? As it seems no matter what I do, it’s always something different, and as has been shown this time round as well; there hasn't been any consistency with what went wrong with these two either, as they both came out different. When surely they would both of been under or over. Which way should I go this time to fix my mistake? Given that I affectively got two different loaves I’m not sure which way to go ? any advice is well appreciated.

 

idaveindy's picture
idaveindy

If what you see doesn't make sense, you may be considering the wrong factors.

--

How old is your starter since it's creation? what's your feed schedule and ratio?

 I'm sensing a starter/levain issue based on the crumb, not merely just an over/under proofing issue.

---

Which was baked first, the one on the left or the one on the right?

How long did you pre-heat the oven before baking the first one?

what did you bake them in/on? Stone, DO?

 If stone, how did you steam?  Where was the steam pan placed in relation to the stone?  This is important because if the steam pan is in between the heating element and the stone, it will slow down the pre-heating of the stone.

If DO, did you preheat the DO and pre-heat the lid?

If DO, did you preheat the DO with the lid on or off?

Is it a convection (fan)'oven?  Where are the heating elements located?  At top, at back, at bottom and exposed, or at bottom and hidden/covered ?

If you have a convection oven, with TOP Heat only, and pre-heat with the lid fully on the DO, the base of the DO may not get up to temp as quickly as you think. Pre-heat with lid askew, or completely off so that hot air currents reach the interior of DO.

--

What I'm getting at is this:   If you have a convection oven, your pre-heat may be insufficient.  A convection oven quickly heats the air, but the baking stone or dutch oven can take 30 minutes to get up to temp.

So.... the oven may tell you that the air is ready, but maybe the stone/DO is still not hot enough.

Hence...:. maybe the first loaf went into a cool stone/DO but the second loaf went into a hot one.   And maybe both of these loaves are under-proofed (or over-proofed), and perhaps suffering from proteolysis to boot.

--

If you still have the loaves, please post photos of the bottom crust. That may give further clues as to  whether the oven was sufficiently pre-heated.

I can only see the edge, but the bottom crust doesn't seem dark enough.

Stephen's picture
Stephen

The starter was created January 20th this year. 
so not exactly a 10years mature starter. But definitely able to create decent enough bread as iv used it for other bread recipes, but as it’s still relatively young I’m not expecting miracles,  though for the most part it does work just maybe not so well as it could as it’s not developed to that stage yet. 
it’s 100% hydration starter.

40g starter 100 flour 100 water

usually done with bread flour, but iv gone on to wholemeal for now as iv heard it’s better for making a more active starter.

the one on the right (the flatter one) was baked first, and came out a bit gummy and a bit dense.

Then about an hour later, the other went in (the one with the air pocket), and came out lighter and nearly gummy at all.

Both baked direct from the fridge.

what I use to bake it in is a old flat handle less non stick pan, and a saucepan which I use as a lid to create the steam effect that you’d otherwise get from using a Dutch oven; obviously I don't have one of these yet, given the current situation with being furloughed at the moment, I’m sure you can understand not wanting to spend money on something, when I can use something else to simulate the same effect.

so that goes in the oven; fan assisted and heated from the back, at 270c for 10 mins to preheat the oven, then I set a  30 mins timer to get it proper hot, with my mock Dutch oven inside.

As soon as the loaf goes in , I turn it down to 230c and bake for 30. Then remove the lid and bake out for another 15 mins, which then gives an internal temperature of near 210f.

both loaves have unfortunately gone now lol. It’s taste really good every time, but it’s always something different that’s gone wrong with its.

I just find it hard to imagine that if both were at the same stage of development, how they come out that different. I’d of thought they would either be both under or over proofed. Surely I’m not over-proofing In the time I’m baking the first one ?

both bottom crusts had been about as dark and as thick as the rest of it; to mean,No more or less than the the rest of the loaf, it was not a very thick crust, if that helps?

you mentioned a Levian issue from what you can assume from what iv mentioned and from looking at the crumb..... is this a reference to how flat the loaf is in general?

My loaves have generally been a bit flatter than I’d of liked, so I would wonder if, as you asked about the age of the starter at the beginning... maybe it’s that it’s not mature enough or even active enough in the first place? Would using whole grain in my starter help this? Looking at my starter now, it’s risen higher than the original bread flour I was using. So I would take this as a good sign.
Maybe as a test I could try doing the recipe again but with a wholemeal starter instead ? Or would you suggest it could be still a bit to early for that?

sorry iv created an essay ? . I’m just a bit eager as you’ve probably worked out. Il consider what you’ve advised so far when I do my next bake. And I look forward to what you can further advise me with, with the feedback given.

HeiHei29er's picture
HeiHei29er

Were the loaves right next to each other in the refrigerator?  I know in mine, the top shelf can be significantly warmer than the bottom shelf, especially if the door is getting opened.  Was the overproofed on an upper shelf and the underproofed on a bottom shelf?

Stephen's picture
Stephen

One was on the bottom shelf and the other was on the shelf above.

In all honesty this wasn’t something I’d of thought to consider. The fridge was a consistent temp of between 2c/4c for the approximate 15 hrs it was In the fridge for.

without thinking this would be a issue, I hadn’t thought to check the positioning of them both in the fridge. But I am aware that the top shelf is usually a touch warmer in most fridges- my own included. So I avoid proofing anything on that shelf anyway.

without thinking fridge positioning would be a issue, I then didn’t think to point this out - even to myself.

but I do know the fridge temp was consistent as I had  a glass of juice I was taking a reading from, and I did ever so gently touch the side of the loaves a few times with the temperature stick just to make sure nothing had changed significantly.

It hadn’t. 
they stayed both the same.

if I had to guess, I’d say the over proofed one was on the higher shelf but as I was taking readings with a probe, (which both came out as the same temp) I didn’t expect either to be that different when baked.

idaveindy's picture
idaveindy

I think Benito was on to something.  Your starter may be too acidic.

What is your feed and stir  schedule for starter maintenance?  Give us the whole show, maintained at room temp vs fridge, how and when fed, when stirred but not fed etc.  (If you did not feed your starter often enough that could make it too acidic.)

For example: my starter is kept in fridge, stirred every 2 days.  Every 6th day it is taken out, discard made, and fed somewhere between 2:1:1 and 1:1:1 with bottled spring water and King Arthur bread flour, kept at 70-74 F in oven for 3 hours, in which it doubles,  and then put back in fridge.

I don't make a levain to bake with, I just use the cold starter, up to 5 days old, and only need 50 grams or so.

--

Your crumb just doesn't look right. Either your starter is not up to snuff, or too acidic, or you are using the wrong flour, or you are using too much water.

You said you were British, so I assume you are in the UK.

You said you were using a US formula, but sometimes other Country's flours do not match close enough. for instance UK "all purpose" flour is not the same as US "all purpose".

 If your King Arthur recipe specified King Arthur all purpose flour, that is typically not UK all purpose, but would be closer to UK bread flour.

If you substituted in any whole grain flour, in the starter/levain or the main dough, that would speed fermentation. 

So you are going to need to show and tell what flour you are using.

There are  a handful of UK bakers on TFL , who can advise. Albacore is a good one.

--

Did I understand correctly that both your lower pan and upper pan spend 40 minutes in the oven during pre-heat? 

Stephen's picture
Stephen

Sorry I’m still very uneducated with technical terms. When you say too acidic  , do you mean it’s to young/not mature enough? How do you know if it’s ready?


I feed once every morning at about 9 or 10 and leave at room temp-about 68f/70f . And that’s it, I don’t stir as it seemed active enough without the agitation as it was doubling in size in about 9/10hrs though it slowly started to stop doubling after a while. If I’m baking with it,I mix however much the recipe asks for the night before to create the levian and leave it at room temperature next to the mother starter and check it the following morning by it passing the float test before using.  
but otherwise the remaining starter which has continued to do its thing undisturbed overnight is then fed as per its usual cycle. The discard I keep in the fridge and make crumpets or pancakes with once a week; but that’s a different story lol?

as to the birth of the starter...... January 20th.
To be fair I have swapped the flours about a bit, to begin with I used British plain flour 9.1 protein to get it started, which didn’t seem to do a lot, so went on to a local wholemeal flour 13.2protein  for about 2 weeks until it was real active and I got a reasonable loaf from it, I then changed to a local bread flour brand 13.3 both flours are the same brand (marriages)  and are both my preferred choice as they are relatively local to me, that’s the story of the starter thus far.

Except, i have today gone back to the wholemeal as I have heard that whole grains are better for starters as they have more nutrition..... or something like that. And it has doubled for the first time in a couple of weeks today as a result. And given that a few times it’s been mentioned that it could in part be due to the inactivity of the starter I felt this was probably the right move in this particular area.

both these flours are used as part of the loaf recipe as well and not just for the starter. 
the recipe in question, yes does indeed say all purpose flour which I had taken to mean British plain to begin with.  
But not believing that British plain and u.s all purpose are exactly the same (having checked the protein content) I did a plain flour loaf and a bread flour loaf to see if there was a difference. 
of course there was a difference, the bread flour loaf came out superior to the plain.
naturally I’m not going to import a flour specific to the recipe from halfway around the world just to make a loaf of bread from time to time, but I had considered maybe mixing some of the plain flour and bread flour I have available to get the protein balance to match that  of the King Arthur flour which I believe is 11.7? I haven’t got that far yet in trialling this theory, but its on my list of trial loaves to try.
Would this work or is that not how it works?
The protein content I believe for the King Arthur flour is only 1.3 less than my available bread flour so didn’t  think it would have a massive impact. Is this not the case? Would that little make that much difference?

I kind of figured out that the plain flour I used in the first loaf lacked the protein and gluten in it to bake a good loaf. Plain flour for me here is usually for making cakes with and generally not flour for bread baking. But always the optimist I tried it out just in case, -it failed lol. 
if it helps to further understand what I’m doing, the recipe is the Vermont sourdough from the King Arthur baking site. I watched the video to see what it should be like, and followed his method of doing the folds for 10 mins every 50 mins and repeat. (Or so I gathered)
though when I done this the first time with the plain flour with a lower protein content of  9.1 as apposed to the bread flour it was easier to do the folding due to the lack of gluten available in the flour. And the dough in the video looked equally easy enough to fold as well, so I felt I was on The right track doing it this way.
Something I noted. was with how easy the dough looked to work with in the video and the ease at which I was then doing it myself. I felt this would work. But alas it failed utterly.
the bread flour though which has a higher protein content 13.3 in contrast was much harder to work with, it was resistant  to more than a couple of folds each time I had a go at it. And with not wanting to risk tearing it and losing any gases, I only did a few folds as apposed  to a full 10 mins of folding. Something that the gent in The video didn't seem to struggle with at all. this was no doubt due to the difference in the flours we used and the extra gluten In the bread flour I was then using.  -again, so iv gathered.
Which first led me to think that I should maybe mix a blend of the two flours to get a healthy protein content that matches the one in the recipe and with enough gluten in it to help provide the strength, which with plain flour alone wouldn’t do, but still give  me enough looseness to the dough to do that much folding?
but from what it sounds like, and from what I’m starting  to understand, is that before we get to that stage.... it is more likely to be a starter issue?
As any loaf I make, regardless of the flour used and whether it’s under or over proofed it comes out relatively the same. I’m understanding the characteristics of the differences once iv bake them, but not yet learnt to notice them beforehand. 
Apart from the giant bubble from a over proofed loaf and the gummyness of a under proofed one they are all coming out relatively the same -flat. 
is this ultimately down to a weak starter? Would using wholegrain flour  as a starter base resolve this, due to the extra nutrition available?  And would fixing this give me bread with more lift? And if so how much more lift  would it give? I dont expect a Miracle cure that’ll give perfect baked bread every time, iv still a fair way to go before then, but would this massively help with the end loaf?
if going by the Current picture as a reference, if I got this right, would it, say double in volume?  And if I take all of that into account, do I still need to allow for time as well to help it develop? Or would just a few wholegrain feeds get me there? I’d always thought the float test was ‘the test’ that said it was good enough to use. But if that’s not the case, then how do you know when it’s ready? Or have I missed something?

and to answer the Dutch oven question. Yes both go In at the same time for that amount of time for 40mins with the lid covering the top to trap steam prior to the the bake.

sorry for the essay of a response, I swear the more answers I read, the more questions I then feel I need to ask. I could probably write a book of questions by the end of this ?

idaveindy's picture
idaveindy

.

idaveindy's picture
idaveindy

.

idaveindy's picture
idaveindy

.

idaveindy's picture
idaveindy

.

mariana's picture
mariana

Hi Stephen,  

I see here the same issue that you had with claggy crumpets - an issue with the starter. It is always either ingredients or recipe that is at fault. In this case, the recipe is failproof.

So the issue is with your starter and with your flour. You did nothing wrong, I think, just test first to make sure that your ingredients are adequate for this recipe. 

I made Vermont sourdough recently and can show you my starter and how I tested that it is good enough to use it in this recipe.

This is my sourdough starter, it sits in the fridge in a jar. It's a mix of 100g of plain flour with 150g water. It's a starter from an old Parisian bakery, I got it from sourdo.com and tested it in this recipe to see what the bread with such starter would smell and taste like.  

First, mix 1 tbsp of sourdough starter (15g) with 95g ice cold water and 75g white flour (11% protein in 100g flour). Place it in a measuring cup. You would have about 1/2 cup of dough inside. 

Let it sit at 20-22C for 12-16hrs. 

At some point it will reach 2 cups mark (quadruple in volume) and then start to recede. This is how mine looked when checked at 15hr mark. 

If you look closer, you can see that it reached 2 cups mark and then started to recede a bit, falling to 1 3/4 cups mark. 

Ok, so the starter is fairly good, the dough rose 4x in volume. However, for the recipe I needed to test it to see if it can leaven the dough, make it rise fast enough. 

I blended it, beating the starter with fork, and thus I punched it down to the original volume of 1/2 cup and watched it rise again at 21C. 

And it more than doubled in volume in 1 hrs. That means it is a good starter for this recipe. In this recipe dough ferments only 2 hrs at 27C and then it is proofed for 2 hrs at 24C and baked for 30 min at 230C. 

Ok, now I have a starter that fermented for a total of 16 hrs at 20-22C and it is surely ready to leaven my bread dough. 

This recipe starts with flour and starter. If your flour is too strong as in Marriage's strong (13.4% protein) or your starter is too weak (generally speaking or too weak for you super strong and tough flour), if your starter can't quadruple in 12hrs at 21C after feeding or, if punched down it can't double in 1 hr prior to mixing your bread dough, then you would get those loaves with dense crumb and big holes under the upper crust. 

The remaining of the Vermont sourdough in my case went without issues. 

170g ripe starter

375g bread flour about 10.5-11.5% protein

50g rye flour

9-10g salt

50g malt syrup (optional, I needed it, because my flour has 0% sugar, Marriage's Strong flour has plenty of sugar)

230g ice cold water. 

1 hr rest after blending ingredients to homogeneity, then mixing (kneading to signs of gluten development), desired dough temperature 24C. 2 hrs fermentation at 27-30C, with a couple of stretches and folds. Divide and shape into two loaves, 2 hrs proof at 24C (room temp). Slash the surface. 30 min bake at 230C, the first 15 min - covered. 

I mixed dough inside my bread machine, 30 min of kneading total because my Canadian plain flour is too strong to knead it by hand. 3x10 min. I had to chill dough in between, it was overheating while Hamelman tells us that it should be 24C at the end of kneading. 

2.5hrs of fermentation at 27-30C with 3x stretches and folds

The dough is ready to be divided into pieces and shaped into two loaves 1 lb each. Total increase in volume at this point is only about 2x, because I stretched and folded this dough 3x in the process of fermentation and it deflated it a bit. 

2 hrs proof at 24C on my countertop, they at least doubled again. 

Scoring and baking

Covered first, it opened up in the first 15 min of baking under cover. 

Uncovered, it continued to bake 15 min longer and got brown crust. 

2 loaves 1 lb each

Crumb

So, test your starter first, Stephen. See if it behaves like mine did: quadruples when fed 15gstarter : 95g ice cold water : 75g flour (11% protein) and left for 12 hrs at 20-22C and then doubles in an hour if punched down all the way to the initial volume of 1/2 cup of starter. 

And blend your Marriage's Strong with Plain to obtain about 11% protein flour (1 part Marriage's + 3 parts Plain flour) and try to knead it by hand for 30 min 10min each session with rest in between, to see if you can actually develop gluten by giving it at least 600 slap and folds in total. See if it stretches into a thin transparent film.

If not, adjust your starter - for example, purchase one from bakerybits or create a new one from scratch, it is not that long of a process, takes a day or two.

https://www.bakerybits.co.uk/bakery-ingredients/yeast-and-starters.html

And find a way to knead dough made from your flour so that it gives you thin films when you stretch it - a developed gluten.

Without those two ingredients (powerful starter and well kneaded dough) the bread won't rise and won't rise spectacularly with more or less even open crumb inside. 

best wishes, 

m. 

idaveindy's picture
idaveindy

Mariana: Your response was more to the point and concise than mine.

Stephen: Mariana is one of the better helpers.  Users Abe and Phaz are also starter experts.

--

Btw, when you blend flours, whisk them to mix well while they are dry, before adding water. They won't combine as well after wetted.