I think it’s commonly accepted that the best breads are the product of long, long ferments, made with sponges, bigas, poolish and what not. Yet, all my “best” breads are those from straight doughs – mix, knead, rise double, shape, proof, bake.
For example, I recently made the toasting bread and buttermilk currant loaf from Hamelman’s book, but neither had the tastiness I would expect from the methods used. I’ve also made a number of time-consuming breads in the past that did not live up to expectations. So, I’ve found myself mostly making those simple “quick” breads that one mostly associates with amateur REGULAR bakers… But gosh darn it, I want to be able to call myself an amateur ARTISAN baker!
Oh, and back when my sourdough was still alive (I went away for the summer, and it did not survive my absence), it produced pretty nice breads, so I do concede that sourdough is great.
Anyone experience the same type of dilemma?
Hey Chiao
Sourdough aside I have not made a whole lot of straight dough breads. I have always made a preferment because thats what all the info on good bread out there tells us. I would like to compare straight with a couple of rises vs a prefermented bread for taste sometime. I have read that preferments affect the properties of the flour making it more extensable or elastic I can't remember which. In the french bread world competition the US team had to and I quote "make extensive use of preferments" in order to be able to use the weak French flour. I would also think that prefers would make that starch/sugar enzyme conversion more effective than a straight dough. Nice clear answer huh.
Da Crumb Bum
Some of your comments sound typical to low altitudes. Are you at sea level? Mini Oven
I generally use more yeast and baking powder (with bk pwd cut back on salt) in my recipes at sea level. :)