Wow is right! Mountaindog recommended this bread, and I have to agree it tastes fantastic! I haven't used Glaser's "Artisan Baking" very much, I think like mountaindog, it was a little too advanced for me when I got it, and then I learned from other books and it was left on the shelf. I also get stuck in ruts, and get lazy and ignore recipes with 5 hour rises, etc!
A couple of notes on deviation from the recipes. One, I just converted a seemingly happy and active wet starter to a stiff one, and it was taking a bit longer than 8 hours to triple in size. It's either the cool temperatures in my house, or I just hadn't refreshed it enough to encourage the beasties that like dry conditions. So, I used a little more preferment than recommended, AND I cheated and threw in a 1/4 teaspoon of yeast. I was on somewhat of a schedule yesterday, and wanted my rising times to be a little more predictable. Even so, I let the first proof go for almost 3 hours, and proofed the final loaves at least 2 hours. (The original recipe called for 4-6, and 3-5 I believe.) Oh and I used malt powder instead of syrup as that's what I had.
I made a fatter batard, a slightly skinnier loaf, and boule in my banetton. They were each around one pound unbaked. The crust is very crackly and crunchy, the crumb (though not as open-holed as mountaindogs) is creamy and lovely. The sourdough tang is nice but not overpowering. There are *very* small amounts of wheat and rye flour in this loaf, and a few tablespoons of toasted wheat germ (which smelled LOVELY), but these tiny amounts added so much to the final loaf.
All and all a relaxing new year's eve bake--I also made a chocolate cake which will definitely be hampering my healthy eating resolutions as it will take a week to eat it! Oh well!
- breadnerd's Blog
- Log in or register to post comments
Wow, your loaves came out looking really lovely! I can never get mine to look that pretty, I still can't seem to get the slashing technique good yet. Your crust cross section looks great too. I agree about the flavors and maybe it is that small amount of wheat germ that really adds flavor.
As far as hole-i-ness, yes , my dough was very wet, it stuck to the bottom of my stand mixer bowl rather than cleaned it, but maybe that's why my loaves spread out sideways so much and were hard to slash neatly. I also made another batch for New Year's Eve dinner and it was good but not quite as good as my first batch, and I think it is due to not having retarted overnight in fridge this time. I will definitely try to plan better to leave time for an overnight retard next time.
Your loaves looked great, that's why I was inspired to try the recipe! Maybe I'll try a wetter dough next time, though I'm happy enough with this. It seems like a great candidate for overnight proofing.
The Bread Alone book mentions adding bran back into white flours, but I usually just throw in a little wheat flour instead. Now I think I'll do both!
I find the wetter starter easier myself, and I also like the milder levain flavors (rather than the tangier ones that are supposed to be connected to the stiffer starters.
I am finding it interesting to try out the stiffer versioins this time around, so I'll do it again for the next batch of columbia, if only to follow the recipe exactly at least once!
I'm planning on firing up the mud oven tomorrow! I think I'll do Columbia, maybe a batch of ciabatta, and I'm not sure what else. We also might try dinner for the first time--(well, except for pizza) either a roast chicken or some kind of curry....
I've always wanted to try this recipe--this site was a great reference during my oven project and they have great photos :)
http://handyprojects.blogspot.com/2005/06/sunday-curry-with-fresh-bread-in-mud.html
My attempt on Essential's Columbia but I think I deviated too much to call it as such. Nevertheless, the flavor was very good.
More pictures in
http://www.angelfire.com/planet/tomsbread/index.htm